Sometimes I’m really glad I don’t
live in Colorado. Don't get me wrong, Colorado has some fantastic attributes: air that is fresh (and sometimes pot-filled), views that
are breathtaking, and, periodically, a really great football team. It
could be heaven. It can also be hell: an Oreo-free hell. (Is there
any other kind?)
First, you must know that the ATG girls
love us some Oreos. In fact, this decades-long friendship was
essentially born over Oreo scarfing and Jenny Jones watching. I don’t
eat these delicious treats much anymore, but I will always have fond feelings towards
them (especially ones straight out of the freezer…A-MAZING).
But you know who apparently doesn’t have
fond feelings towards Oreos? Coloradoans. Or, more specifically, the
administrators at Children’s Academy in Aurora, CO. They recently
sent one of their 4-year-old students home with a baggie of uneaten
Oreos and a note that went a little something like this:
Dear Parents, it is very important
that all students have a nutritious lunch. This is a public school
setting and all children are required to have a fruit, a vegetable,
and a healthy snack from home, along with milk. If they have
potatoes, the child will also need bread to go along with it.
Lunchables, chips, fruit snacks, and peanut butter are not considered
to be a healthy snack. This is a very important part of our program
and we need everyone's participation.
So, to recap, every child at this uber healthy (and
superior-feeling) public school is required to
bring a fruit, veggie and milk. Required. What if they’re lactose
intolerant? Is this school getting kickbacks from Borden? And how
about the Lunchables thing? Is it only Lunchables that are prohibited
or can children not have any kind of sandwich meat/processed cheese?
And then there’s the bit about “If they have potatoes, the child
will also need bread to go along with it.” Since when is a lunch of
bread and potatoes healthy? It sounds like carbo loading to me. And
in case you were unaware, carbs are the devil. They will kill you.
Slowly. Much like watching anything on the E! network will.
Listen, it’s one thing for schools to
not provide junk food for their students. In fact, a lot of
schools are hopping on the healthy-eating bandwagon, either by choice
or by force. That’s fine. If they want to fill their vending
machines with tofu and seltzer water, great. Beautiful. That’s
their business. But to flat-out tell parents what they can and cannot
feed their children for lunch?! Does that not take micromanaging to a
whole new level? (And believe me, if anyone knows micromanaging it’s
me. So me.) The phrase “mind your business” comes to mind.
I have two thoughts on this. First,
doesn’t human behavior dictate that when you make something totally
illegal, totally impermissible and totally verboten, you also make it
totally appealing? This school is pretty much guaranteeing that all
of its students will be 400 pounds by high school graduation.
And two, in a world where children
aren’t even safe at school – from violence, abuse or bullying –
aren’t there more important conversations we should be having? Is a
delicious crème-filled chocolate cookie really the problem? I'm leaning towards no.
And on that note, I’m off to buy a
package of Double Stuf Oreos. We as Americans must stand united on
this; we must make our voices heard.
So I will
overindulge on Oreos, not because I want to, but because, as a true
patriot, it is my duty.
I’m sure I won’t enjoy a single
bite.
No comments:
Post a Comment