It's a rare moment when this opinionated writer checks
her judgment and sarcasm at the door, but you lucky readers are about to
witness it. Take it in because it’s a lot like seeing Bigfoot or the aurora borealis: a once-in-a-lifetime experience.
Friday, August 24, 2012
Call Me Patriotic
Labels:
Aurora Borealis,
Bigfoot,
Call Me Maybe,
Carly Rae Jepsen,
United States Army,
USO
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Out of the Mouths of Babes
Of all the things one could criticize Prince William for—unwillingness
to take on royal duties, being spoiled and stubborn, choosing a worthless
consort—Justin Bieber chose, wait for it, the prince’s hair (or lack thereof)
to attack. The Biebster was recently interviewed by U.K.’s Rollercoaster magazine and said, in reference to prince William’s
thinning locks, “I mean, there are things to prevent that nowadays, like
Propecia. I don’t know why he doesn’t just get those things, those products.
You just take Propecia and your hair grows back. Have you not got it over
here?”
![]() | |
Would you take hair advice from this guy?! |
I must admit, I, too, have wondered why Prince Baldylocks
hasn’t chosen to treat this problem. Sure, it’s superficial, but we live in a
superficial world and surely a prince would want to look his best—especially when
he has unlimited resources to do so. I mean, obviously his wife has no problem
spending the taxpayers' money in abundance to make herself look good(ish). Why can’t
the heir as well?
![]() |
His hair-filled days are obviously numbered. |
But, it turns out that little Justin was wrong. According
to various health experts, Propecia doesn’t replenish lost hair; it simply
prevents continued hair loss. It also apparently prevents procreation, as one
of the side effects is a reduced libido. I would imagine that very little could
reduce the poor prince’s libido more than his skeletal wife, but if he intends
to do his duty of siring an heir and a spare, it’s probably best to stay away
from such drugs. Maybe he could get some of that hair in a can instead.
Getting back to the Bieb’s comment, though…
In his defense
I can kind of see where he’s coming from. After all, his luscious locks are
really all he has going for him. Once he and his fanlets hit puberty, Bieber is
assured a one-way ticket to Has-Beenville, so it’s understandable that going
bald is such a terrifying concept for him. Plus, he’s proven time and again
that he’s not very smart. We should just start expecting this nonsense to spew
from his uneducated mouth and save ourselves the time and energy it takes to be
offended.
Now that we’ve cleared that up, and while we’re still on
the topic of royals, check out this adorable interview with a very young
Charles and Diana, and an even younger William and Harry, looking every bit like a happy
family unit. I suppose it just goes to show how deceiving looks can be, as it
wasn’t too much later that this “happy family” completely imploded.
Labels:
British Royal Family,
Foolish Statements,
Justin Bieber,
Prince Baldylocks,
Prince William,
Propecia
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Eat Your Heart Out, Ponce de León
Juan Ponce de León would be proud. Five centuries after
his infamous search for the Fountain of Youth landed him in Florida, the
allusive fountain has finally been found. In a plastic surgeon’s office. You
want evidence? I give you Exhibit A:
![]() |
Jackie Stallone at the Expendables 2 premiere. |
Sure, Sylvester Stallone’s mom, Jackie, looks a hot mess,
but she looks like a hot mess in her 70s. Would it surprise you to hear, then,
that this woman, the woman who sired Rocky, is actually 90?!
Apparently all the collagen, saline, and Botox have had
an embalming effect on her body. She may scare small children, but she will
never age. And, in the end, isn’t that all that really matters? I guess in that
respect, the world hasn’t changed much in the last 500 years.
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Her Cheating Heart
Unfortunately for Robert Pattison, it's not just Kristen
Stewart's heart that's been cheating. Nope, it appears that she’s been engaging
in some extracurricular activities with a man nearly twice her age. Sure, it's
an old story—one that I'm sure you've all heard about—but fortunately for us,
the break-up of this Twilight twosome is the gift that keeps on giving.
![]() |
The loved-up couple when they were still loved-up. |
When the news broke that Bella had cheated on Edward
with Rupert Sanders, the married director of her latest forgettable film, Snow White and the Hunstman, people were
shocked, and I must admit, I was too—not because she’d cheated (hello, it's
Hollywood), but because KStew is still getting work as an actress. Am I the
only one aware of her total inability to act? This girl, at the ripe old age of
22, is already the clear front-runner for the Lifetime Achievement Razzie, ahead
of such acting greats as Nicolas Cage and Cameron Diaz. That’s saying a lot.
But back on topic…
The irony gods were most definitely smiling on us with
this one as, just weeks before, RPatz gave an interview to Italian Vanity Fair
saying that he “never understood” people who cheat. It’s not surprising, then,
that five seconds after the story broke, he was seen moving out of the bat cave
he shared with his philandering lover.
Of course, the story is quite sad if you consider that these are real people, with real feelings, and not just performing monkeys whose sole purpose is to amuse us. The reality is, Sanders is married with two children. How long he’ll stay married is anyone’s guess, but his wife doesn’t appear to think it will be for long. She’s recently been seen without her wedding ring, which isn’t necessarily surprising, but is still awfully sad—at least for their kids.
Of course, the story is quite sad if you consider that these are real people, with real feelings, and not just performing monkeys whose sole purpose is to amuse us. The reality is, Sanders is married with two children. How long he’ll stay married is anyone’s guess, but his wife doesn’t appear to think it will be for long. She’s recently been seen without her wedding ring, which isn’t necessarily surprising, but is still awfully sad—at least for their kids.
As for Pattinson, who allegedly wrote love songs for his
trampire (thank you, Will Ferrell, for the one funny thing you’ve ever said),
and was rumored to be planning a marriage proposal any minute, he seems to be
fairing okay. He clearly wins in the court of public opinion and he’s just not
a good enough actor to put on a brave face that convincingly if there wasn’t
some truth behind it. Now, far be it from me to judge anyone’s choice in
partner—I myself have been known to make some really, really bad dating
choices—but, really, what did he lose? Kristen Stewart? An exceedingly awkward,
clown-dressing (see below), embarrassingly bad actress who has a perma-look of
constipation on her face? No biggie.
![]() |
Do you think she looked in the mirror and thought, "Damn! I look good!" The scariest part? She's allowed to vote. |
I never really understood what he saw in her in the first
place (or, to be fair, vice versa). And now that he’s single, I’m sure there
are plenty of girls impatiently waiting to pick up the pieces of his broken
heart.
For instance, this girl:
Should we start taking bets on how long it will be before this YouTube darling has her own reality show?
Lucky for Robsten, the Twilight movies are in the can, so at least they’re saved from having to shoot uncomfortable love scenes. It's a shame, though, about the painfully long press tour they'll still have to embark on. How do you say “awkward” in Vampire?
Labels:
Bad Life Choices,
Bad PR Moves,
Cheating Jerks,
Hollywood Splits,
Homewreckers,
Irony,
Kristen Stewart,
Nutty Madam,
Philanderers,
Razzies,
Robert Pattinson,
Robsten,
Rupert Sanders,
Trampire,
Vampires
Friday, August 3, 2012
An Olympic-Scented Potpourri
In case you haven’t heard, the U.S. kicked some serious international
butt in the swimming pool this week. One of the butt-kickers was none other
than the adorable Nathan Adrian, who won gold in the 100-meter freestyle. And,
the best news of all (for him) is that he didn’t even have a wardrobe
malfunction, something he’s had problems with in the past (check out the guy in the middle with the white cap). Of course, my love
for his face was tempered quite a bit when I realized that he reminded me of my
brother. That just ain’t right.
![]() |
Nathan Adrian, my brother from another mother |
Oh well. It never would’ve worked anyway. He’s barely out
of utero.
______________________________________
In case you haven’t heard, the Olympics are in London this year, which means a fair amount of royal-family coverage (although, let’s be honest, the press doesn’t really need a reason to plaster pictures of Waity—or (not-so) Weighty—Katie all over the universe). I don’t particularly care about a large percentage of the royals, but we can never get enough Sweet Ginger Prince pics here at ATG. How can you not love this guy?
![]() |
Thumbs up, buttercup! |
![]() |
Prince Fabulous, in the flesh |
If loving him is wrong, then I don’t want to be right.
____________________________________
In case you haven’t heard, the international gymnastic
powers-that-be are doing everything they can to ruin the sport. First, they did
away with the rule that the top 25 gymnasts go to the all-around competition—regardless
of country—and instead, wanting to spread the wealth, now send the top two from
each country—regardless of skill level. Sure, makes (absolutely no)
sense. But their truly moronic tie-breaking rule tops even that.
Let me set the stage: American Gabby Douglas won gold in the
women’s all-around (Go, Gabby!), which I have no beef with.
![]() |
Don't let the sweet smile fool you; Gabby Douglas is hardcore. |
But, the
other American competing in the all-around, Aly Raisman, tied Russian diva, Aliya
Mustafina, for the bronze. Unlike swimming, however, both athletes are not
awarded a medal in the event of a tie. No, that would make too much sense.
You see, in women’s gymnastics, the athletes compete in
four different events or rotations: vault, balance beam, uneven bars, and floor
exercise. And the new rule says that, in the event of a tie, the judges should
add the scores from the athlete’s top three events--which is essentially the
same as dropping her lowest score from the fourth event--and whoever has the best score after that, wins. It sounds
fair enough until you break it down. The ladies both had a total all-around score
of 59.566 for their four events, with both their lowest scores coming on
balance beam: 14.200 for Raisman and 13.66 for Mustafina (which reflected a
fall off the beam).
![]() |
America's Raisman (L) and Russia's Mustafina (R) |
So far so good?
Here’s the problem (and stick with me because it could get messy): Subtracting a smaller number (a worse
score) from the total all-around score gives you a larger remainder (i.e. a
higher final score). This means that because Raisman scored higher on beam, a 14.200,
subtracting her score gives her a lower overall score than Mustafina, who only
scored a 13.66. (Bet you weren’t bargaining for all this ATG math.)
It looks like this:
Raisman: 59.566 (overall score) – 14.200 (beam score) = 45.366 (new overall score)
Mustafina: 59.566 (overall score) – 13.66 (beam score) = 45.906 (new overall score)
Therefore, because Mustafina’s worst event scored lower
than Raisman’s, she ended up with a higher overall score and, consequently, the
bronze medal. If I’m missing something here, please let me know, because at
this point I can’t see any logic in the tie-breaker system. I mean, in what
universe does it make sense to reward the person with the lower score by giving
her a medal?
Apparently, in the gymnastics universe, and that just ain’t
right.
Labels:
2012 Olympics,
A Judgment-Scented Potpourri,
Aliya Mustafina,
Aly Raisman,
Gabby Douglas,
Nathan Adrian,
Prince Harry,
Rules Were Made To Be Broken,
Smells Like Team Spirit,
Women's Gymnastics
Weep Not for the Memories
Here’s some information you can file under Random and, perhaps, Why Should I Care?. Apparently, around
the time Jason Priestley was moving to Beverly Hills and Brad Pitt was seducing
Geena Davis, the two heartthrobs were also hanging out together.
![]() |
Pitt is on the far left and Priestley is the mullet-loving dude (I know, that doesn't narrow it down) at second from right. |
Who knew?
Of course, I’m most impressed with Jason’s choice of
living room furniture. As a struggling actor, obviously you have to prioritize,
and who has money to waste on chairs you won’t stick to when there’s beer and
Doritos to be bought? But the two look comfy enough, as do the rest of their
squad, as they cozied up to watch the 1990 Super Bowl.
So what’s the take-away here? Football brings people
together—even pre-famous pretty boys who’ve made questionable hair choices.
Labels:
Brad Pitt,
Jason Priestley,
Mullets,
Plastic Beach Chairs,
Super Bowl
Say What?!
Few would argue that 2008 was Michael Phelps’s Olympics. He
won eight gold medals—setting an Olympic record—and became America’s most celebrated
swimmer since Flipper.
![]() |
The Phelpster with one of his latest medals. |
You may be
surprised to learn, then, that there were actually other swimmers representing
the United States in Beijing. Shocking, I know, but plenty of Americans were
swimming out their Olympic dreams that year, and it’s my belief that they should’ve
gotten some publicity as well. That’s why it was so refreshing to see that,
this year, other swimmers are getting (almost) as much attention. I was
especially glad to see Ryan Lochte at the head of the press pack, seeing as how
his dad coached my friend’s cousins, so I basically know him (six degrees and
everything. It totally counts).
Unfortunately, my happiness was short-lived (story of my
life) when I made the mistake of watching Ryan in an interview. Let’s just say
that he should probably stick to swimming and print ads. And after reading an
interview his mom gave recently, it’s fairly clear that foot-in-mouth disease
runs in the family.
![]() |
The heartthrob and his loose-lipped mom |
Now, I’ll be the first to admit that I was horrified when
I first read Ike Lochte’s quote that Ryan, “goes out on one-night stands,” a revelation
that seemed to indicate that Ms. Lochte had taken a page out of Kris Jenner’s favorite
book: The Idiot’s Guide to Being a
Terrible Parent. However, on closer inspection, I think perhaps she just misspoke.
After all, she followed up by saying that “He's not able to give fully to a
relationship because he's always on the go.” So, I’m going to give her the benefit
of the doubt and assume that what she meant to say was that her son is too busy
to date anyone seriously. It’s not
that he has one-night stands, but one-night—or one-time—dates. Meaning, he’s too busy for a relationship, so he just dates
casually. Now, whether or not those dates end in one-night stands, I couldn’t
say.
And I sincerely hope his mother can’t either.
Labels:
2012 Olympics,
Ike Lochte,
Loose Lips Sink Ships,
Michael Phelps,
Ryan Lochte,
Smells Like Team Spirit
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)